Review: Quantum of Solace (2008)

[Steve Rhodes]

QUANTUM OF SOLACE
A film review by Steve Rhodes
Copyright 2008 Steve Rhodes

RATING (0 TO ****):  * 1/2

QUANTUM OF SOLACE, which has possibly the worst title of a major motion 
picture this year, is the latest in the long running and extremely 
successful Bond series, of which I am a big fan.  Sure, the franchise has 
had its ups and downs, but QUANTUM OF SOLACE has the dubious honor of being 
the first Bond film that manages to be downright boring.  Previous Bond 
movie disappointments, such as ON HER MAJESTY'S SECRET SERVICE, had enough 
good parts and characters to keep our interest.  But there isn't anything 
worth seeing in QUANTUM OF SOLACE, save the traditional Bond theme music, 
which is relegated to the closing credits.  Don't even get me started on the 
disastrous opening credits, which features the blandest and worst Bond song 
ever.  Elevator music makers would reject it as too pathetic.

The problems with QUANTUM OF SOLACE, which are many, can't be blamed on 
Daniel Craig's second rendition of James Bond.  In CASINO ROYALE, Craig 
proved that he was a terrific choice to be the latest actor to play the 
super suave 007.  Indeed CASINO ROYALE was so good that I ranked it as the 
fourth best film of 2006.  While QUANTUM OF SOLACE probably isn't quite bad 
enough to make my worst of the year list, it would undoubtedly top any list 
I might make of this year's most disappointing movies.

Although I went into the theater fully expecting to love QUANTUM OF SOLACE, 
or at the bare minimum, to at least like it and be entertained by it, I 
should not have been so naive.  I should have remembered my own trailer 
rule.  As I have said in many other reviews, the trailer for a movie can be 
a dead giveaway.  If the trailer is good, it reassures you of very little. 
The movie itself may or may not be worth seeing.  It's actually pretty easy 
to make an exciting trailer by using the best bits from any movie.  But, if 
the trailer is bad, as QUANTUM OF SOLACE's trailer certainly is, one can be 
reasonably sure that the movie will stink.  After seeing this film, I am 
surer than ever of my trailer rule.

So what is wrong with QUANTUM OF SOLACE?  A lot.  I'd start with the 
director, Marc Forster (THE KITE RUNNER and STRANGER THAN FICTION).  He 
appears clueless as to what he is trying to attempt.  As the movie starts, 
it doesn't even appear to a Bond movie at all.  In a dizzying series of 
blurry shots, cut to a spastic microsecond metronome, we watch an action 
hero who wants badly to be the next Jason Bourne.

Although I hated seeing Bond transformed into a cliched knockoff of an 
action hero from another series, this turned out not to be the worst part of 
the production.  Eventually, the film slows down enough to let the actors 
speak.  It was at this point that the film really began to sag.

Normally, Bond movies feature wonderfully outlandish villains with great 
diabolical schemes to destroy the world.  This time, however, the movie's 
villain is as bland and his aspirations are as pedestrian as his last name, 
Greene (Mathieu Amalric).  Trying for pseudo relevance, something Bond films 
normally and wisely eschew, the villain this time just wants to secure 
controlling interest in the oil field of Bolivia.  Ho hum.

Besides being saddled with an insipid villain, Bond is also paired with a 
lifeless Bond girl.  Not all of the women in Bond films have been good, but, 
at least they have all been fairly alluring.  Olga Kurylenko's Camille 
brings nothing to the movie.  She isn't particularly tough, smart or sexy. 
She is just there -- the token female opposite Bond.

The list of problems is almost endless.  The cinematography, something that 
is fairly easy to get right, ranges from washed out interior colors to dull 
travelogue sequences of beautiful landscapes rendered in such a slapdash 
manner as to make the gorgeous appear merely okay.

And, then there is the film's sound.  Usually Bond movies are models of 
clarity, as the actors are careful in their enunciations, thus demonstrating 
their pride in the script's dialog.  QUANTUM OF SOLACE, however, is rife 
with mumbled dialog spoken too low.

Still, the elocution of the actors could be somewhat of a blessing in 
disguise because you miss much of the miserable dialog.  In the best and the 
worst of the Bond films, you can usually count on lots of funny moments, 
full of witty lines.  But QUANTUM OF SOLACE is a fun-free film with at best 
a few mildly risible incidents.  I snickered a few times.  Never loudly.

Director Forster has simply sucked the life out of a great series.  This 
film ends with the reminder that James Bond will return.  Never, have I 
looked forward less to the next film in the series.  Trying to end this 
review on a positive note, I guess I can say that surely the next movie has 
to be better.

QUANTUM OF SOLACE runs 1:46.  It is rated PG-13 for "intense sequences of 
violence and action, and some sexual content" and would be acceptable for 
kids around 10 and up.

My son Jeffrey, age 19, and a huge Bond fan like his dad, gave the film just 
one *.  He had a long series of complaints about the movie, which is 
probably best summarized when he said that it was just so dull and had a 
horrible storyline.  He likes the way that the plot for Bond films are 
usually really out there, but he hated the way this one tried too hard to be 
relevant to today, and he hated all of the America bashing in the movie.  He 
said the film contained every chase scene possible, while the time between 
the chases was all dead space.  He ranks this Bond film as the worst one 
ever, and he has seen them all.

The film opens nationwide in the United States on Friday, November 14, 2008. 
In the Silicon Valley, it will be showing at the AMC theaters, the Century 
theaters and the Camera Cinemas.

Web: http://www.InternetReviews.com
Email: Steve.Rhodes at InternetReviews.com

***********************************************************************

Want reviews of new films via Email?
Just write Steve.Rhodes at InternetReviews.com and put "subscribe" in the 
subject line.