Review: Hancock (2008)

[Scott Mendelson]

Hancock
2008
95 minutes
rated PG-13

Mainstream critics and pundits are again missing the boat on a
challenging and worthwhile mainstream motion picture. Don't believe
the majority of the reviews. Peter Berg's Hancock is a truly engaging
and emotionally compelling character drama that happens to be
disguised as a broad superhero satire.

It is not a perfect film and the third act seems a little rushed (it's
no secret that it was cut from 115 minutes to 95 minutes), but this is
a real movie, not an assembly-line factory confection. There is strong
acting from all parties, including Will Smith, Jason Bateman, and
Charlize Theron. In particular, Jason Bateman as Ray takes a character
that could have been a stock cardboard cut-out, a sounding board at
which the plot unfolds, and he makes him into a sympathetic flesh and
blood human being. Ray's attempts to convince corporations to engage
in wholesale charity is played for real, and his explanation of how he
met his wife is both touching and surprisingly honest. A lesser movie
would have used his decency and his desire to do good as a punchline,
but this movie takes it very seriously, and its that desire that
drives the movie in ways both expected and unexpected.

Will Smith doesn't shy away from making the character not only
unlikable, but also desperately sad and confused. He does great deeds
and thinks that should be enough, and he doesn't understand why he
should have to be polite and humble when he's saving lives (a subtle
critique of the current issues that America has with the rest of the
world?). But, like Bateman, he has an inherent want to help people and
do good, and that drives him to fight crime even when the public hates
him for it. For reasons that I won't reveal, Hancock believes that he
is deserving of his scorn and thus takes no steps to correct it.

Much has been said of the third-act change. It is not a twist per se,
as it's obviously telegraphed from the opening scenes. But it is a
progression of story and that may be what is jolting the critics. It
is rare in these days for mainstream movies to have stories that
gradually unfold throughout all three acts. Usually, 90% of the story
is told in the first act and the rest of pay-off. Not Hancock, it has
a story, it has a plot, and it's a plot that unfolds over the entire
movie. Even in the final scenes, we are still seeing character
development and still learning new things about the world that we have
been dropped into. The climax contains action, but it is brutal,
unglamourous, emotionally compelling action, and the climactic
violence is merely a means to allow character choices to be made and
relationships to strengthen, weaken, or change. In fact, all of the
action scenes are driven by the story and character actions and they
all serve important story elements.

How refreshing that Sony chose to withhold this information, to allow
moviegoers to actually be surprised for once. The trailers reveal only
the first act and bits of the second act, and in that sense the
trailers are accurate. The first act is very funny and the second act
does some fun things with the idea of a superhero rehabilitating
himself (not enough, and I'd wager that stuff was cut from this
section). The climax of the second act also has a great dialogue scene
with the three leads that is revealing and uncommonly well-written for
this genre (this is where Bateman's story of meeting Theron comes in).
And even the third-act has an emotional oomph that builds to an
absolutely lovely coda just before the credits role.

How distressing that Sony seems to be getting attacked for not
revealing the entire film in a three-minute advertisement. It's as if
critics are taken aback at actually not knowing where the story was
going. God forbid we actually not know every plot point before we see
the movie. Sony should be commended for withholding plot points in the
marketing. And, apparent tinkering aside, they should be commended for
financing this $150 million tentpoler and allowing Peter Berg to make
a film that is very much a distinct point of view and actually has a
brain. It's not a perfect film, and I can't wait to see an extended
version, but Hancock is far better than the critical buzz and is a
completely compelling motion picture.

Grade - B